The Swaption Blunder Continues...

...And County Executive John Stoffa can't seem to get his mind on track.

We get that you have much troubles looming behind the deceptions you have caused, but man oh man, pay off this painful Swaption already.

Ladies and gentlemen of NorCo, the swaption as reported during last weeks CC meeting, went from a whopping 25 million just days before the meeting, to a whopping whopping 26.3 million the day of the meeting.

Simple math tells us thats' 1.3 million in just days that Mr. Stoffa, by failing to pull the trigger, has cost us.

Mr. Stoffa should hurry-up...STOP playing games with our HARD EARNED TAX dollars...and pay this animal off already.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!

Please Read :http://www.lehighvalleylive.com/northampton-county/index.ssf/2012/05/northampton_county_council_app_5.html

What Does "We The People" Mean?...

...It means - the power of government comes from THE PEOPLE.

The Preamble of the Constitution says "We The People" because it was THE PEOPLE who were granting powers to the government, an absolutely extraordinary idea when the Constitution was written...as it still is today.

Acknowledging of course, that our Brilliant Founding Fathers were being persecuted by the King then, as we are persecuted by the Executive of the County today.

NO...There is no difference between the King then, and our County Executive today...just as there is no difference between TAXPAYER DOLLARS, and COUNTY DOLLARS.

And yes...The king had hench-men then...just as the Executive has Bernard (The Disbarred Attorney) O'Hare today...The worst hench-man we have been dominated by since the birth of our great union...and how exactly does the Merriam-Webster define a Hench-man? Hummm...lets see:

• 1: Obsolete: a squire or page to a person of high rank - no, that's not it.
• 2a: a trusted follower: a right hand man - getting warmer. 
• b: a political follower whose support is chiefly for personal advantage - real hot.
• c: a member of a GANG - Ding Ding Ding - they (Stoffa, Angle, and O'Hare) are definitely a political band out for themselves, a clique no better than those that roam the streets...hit the nail on the head - giv'em a cigar. 

Must never ever allow any form of tyranny within our goverment, especially such that force us to unlearn or forget our moral obligation to humnaity.

GOD Bless America, and her PEOPLE.

Is Mr. Stoffa Really A Good Person?...

...Not according to himself!


What does that mean, you ask? Simple - just watch the second business matters Gracedale episode titled..."Selling Gracedale - The Debate Rages On" and 1min 26 seconds or so into the show you will hear Mr. Stoffa tell the host Tony Ianelli that Tony is wrong to believe the "he" (Mr. Stoffa is a good person) after TI said he beleved Mr. Stoffa to be such a person.

Stoffa said it...so it MUST be true;-)

What Others Are Saying....

...relating to the PROFANE NONSENSICAL IGNORAMUS and his bossman.

LVRumblings:
http://lehighvalleyrumblings.blogspot.com/

Broad&Pen:
http://broadandpennsylvania.blogspot.com/2012/05/barron-right-to-push-legal-fees-issue.html

You Asked To See It...

...Here it is:
As per request from one of our readers, below is the resolution that was adopted 08/19/2010.

Another Possible Jail Sentence...

...For MISUSE of TAXPAYER funds.

With all this going on all over the state (and nation) you would think our County Executive would have steered clear of wrong doing...but NO, just as the others led by arrogance, so did Mr. Stoffa. Just remember sir...you made, and continue making - the bed. Eventually you will have to LIE in it!

Retire NOW, and possibly this mess you helped create goes away...stay the course, and who knows where you to may end up? Do the County an favor - step down NOW.

Read On:
http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/region/state-supreme-court-justice-melvin-expected-to-be-charged-today-636445/

http://www.politicspa.com/justice-orie-melvin-could-be-charged-friday/35743/

Here We Go...

This morning BO posted on his hate blog at 2:40 am some very amusing remarks about "Still Practicing" Attorney Larry Otter who must have bit O'Hare on his ankle with his sharp teeth, inspiring the entertaining remarks.

He goes on to state: "Ron Angle and I, as some of you no doubt remember, had challenged the validity of the signatures for a referendum on Gracedale's sale. We lost the case."

He conveniently left out the fact that they both claimed at the time - that they never received help from Mark Stuart of Eckard Seamans, hired by the County specifically to handle County business, not PRIVATE LITIGATION.


He went on to say: "The reality? "I really resented the claim that anyone "coached" me. I spent weeks in the elections office, reviewing nomination petitions. I spent at least another week researching and preparing a complaint. It was my work product. But yes, I sent numerous drafts of my Complaint, as it evolved. Right before filing, I received some suggestions from an attorney at the firm engaged to conduct Gracedale's sale. I accepted most of them. "

First off - he says he resents the claim that he was coach...but, then he says - yeah I got some suggestions and accepted them. Yes, the profane O'Hare seems to be coming apart at the seams. Perhaps he's losing it! Maybe something in his coffee? Anyway...how on earth can you resent the TRUTH?

O'hare claims - "This firm was acting under express authority of a County Council resolution that stated its "clear intent" was to authorize this law firm "to facilitate and expedite all issues" that would result in Gracedale's sale." BINGO...nothing about dealing with PRIVATE LITIGATION!

Further stating: "Presumably, that would include discussions with allied private litigants who are attempting to achieve the very same goal. The resolution is broad enough that the firm actually could have represented us, although we preferred to make our own mistakes." WRONG!!!

This statement clearly implies that he and Angle had discussions with Mark Stuart of ES relating to their PRIVATE LITIGATION...which by the way folks, on numerous occasion before they denied ever happened - well, it appears the TRUTH is being revealed. If we are to believe this statement, it would indicate that they lied before. But, wait...if we believed what they said before...wouldn't that make this statement a LIE? Why - YES it would.

He continues to damn himself (and others) with this remark: "Now you could argue that Council never dreamed that the firm it hired would discuss a matter with allied private litigants. I get that. But the language in the resolution is what controls. Facilitate and expedite all issues leading to Gracedale's sale, charged Council. "

No, council never dreamed that the firm they hired would have such discussions with private litigants because that was never their direction nor their intent!

Stay Tuned...more to come.