O'hare does not have the intelligence to understand that we IN FACT welcome any law suit that he, or anyone else for that matter, may be planning. We The People are tired of his nonsense, and we are poised to prove that he is a LIAR - and we can do it right here...right now.
The Disbarred Attorney - Bernard O'hare III
Proven here to have lied to - We The People.
O'hare who was disbarred for among other things, lying - on May 2, 2011, he was dense enough to go on WFMZ's Business Matters inspired by Ron Angle - to attempt to expose Rev. Mario Martinez as a fake, instead he exposed himself again as a LIAR.
At approximately 16 min 25 sec into the episode "Selling Gracedale - The Debate Rages On" http://www.wfmz.com/news/Selling-Gracedale-The-Debate-Rages-On/-/121458/406224/-/qflkm0z/-/index.html We can all hear the Coalition representative Rev. Martinez tell Ohare what We The People will not except...At approximately 16:52 -17:03 we hear Gracedale Union Representative Justus James say clearly "we have people sitting next to us" (meaning Ohare and Stoffa) who sued "We The People" with our own "TAX" dollars...and while O'Hare chooses to lie, Stoffa decides it might be better to just keep quiet...does not confirm nor deny it.
17:04 Tony Iannelli ask O'hare - "I think you hired your own law firm right?"...
...Then at approximately 17:08 we hear the great words of the DISBARRED LIAR say - "NO, I REPRESENTED MYSELF" - "I PREPARED MY OWN CASE".
At approximately 17:14 the Reverend says "you did a poor job cause you lost" and the DISBARRED LIAR says "well maybe I did a poor job cause I lost - but I DID IT MY SELF". GOTCHA!!!
Yeah right...sure, okay...if that has an ounce of truth in it, then why is there an email on-line today:
Which clearly shows that Mark Stewart of Eckerd Seamans hired by County Council SPECIFICALLY to assist in the sale of Gracedale, is also on our dime assisting O'hare and Angle in their case preparation?
And to add insult to injury - it also shows clearly that the County Executive Mr. Stoffa was not only very much aware of it, but his remarks to Mr. Stuart in the email can only be construed to mean that he approved of it.
The time is coming to answer some questions...
...lets do it under oath.